Excellent point @qubit! Never thought this could be the case, that a well-known often default pdf reader (although I don't know exactly which one OP used) is designed to bypass security permissions, but after testing it with documents created with other apps eg. pdftk it is obvious that [continued]
luyu ( 2013-02-14 08:01:13 +0200 )editit's not LibreOffice's fault. Sorry for false alarm. It seems aforementioned pdf reader only takes into account user password (for opening document) but disregards all permissions. This raises important question: what's the point of setting pdf permissions when they can be trivially bypassed?
luyu ( 2013-02-14 08:08:19 +0200 )edit@luyu -- You'd have to ask the people who wrote the spec that! :-) As people have continually (re)discovered, with perhaps the latest (re)incarnation being SnapChat, you basically have two options when it comes to security of an item: You share it (unencrypted) or you don't (encrypted).
qubit ( 2013-02-14 18:18:40 +0200 )edit