Ask Your Question
2

Why is version 3.5.0 "recommended" on the Download page? It has poor (almost beta) quality. [closed]

asked 2012-03-01 17:58:51 +0200

nnino gravatar image nnino
31 1 1 6
http://wiki.documentfound...

updated 2012-03-02 15:41:35 +0200

MagicFab gravatar image MagicFab flag of Canada
690 5 12 23
http://wiki.documentfound...

Don't get me wrong: I don't want to rant. I just want to know why LibreOffice traits its users as fools. This is not a good policy IMHO. Release 3.5.0 still has so many bugs that it should not be recommended without explanation for normal users. It's ok to recommend it to Early Adopters, but Joe Average should be offered 3.4.5 or 3.3.4.

delete reopen flag offensive retag edit

The question has been closed for the following reason "question is not relevant or outdated" by manj_k
close date 2013-01-20 02:21:29.436573

1 Answer

Sort by » oldest newest most voted
2

answered 2012-03-01 20:05:53 +0200

drone27of1 gravatar image drone27of1 flag of Canada
216 6

updated 2012-03-01 20:06:25 +0200

I do agree with you that the front page and download page should also display 3.4.5
However, on the release-notes, it does point this out.
https://www.libreoffice.org/download/release-notes
3.5: This is the initial release from the 3.5 branch of LibreOffice.
It contains many exciting new features, and is the recommended version for power users.

3.4.5: fixes the most-important bugs identified by users in the previous version, and of course can be deployed for production needs. aka average joe

link delete flag offensive edit

Donate

LibreOffice is made available by volunteers around the globe, backed by a charitable Foundation. Please support our efforts: Your donation helps us to deliver a better product!

Question tools

Follow
1 follower

subscribe to rss feed

Stats

Asked: 2012-03-01 17:58:51 +0200

Seen: 188 times

Last updated: Mar 02 '12