Ask Your Question

Revision history [back]

click to hide/show revision 1
initial version

There are basically two approaches to this:

Eliminate confidential data from the document

This is the preferred way, as then the document can be shared freely, but of course a modified document might not trigger the problem anymore, so this doesn't always work.

What you should always do when submitting a sample document: Try to minimize it as much as possible. Delete first half of document, check whether the problem still occurs, if not, check whether it still occurs with the other half. Repeat with the half that still shows the problem until after deleting anything won't show the problem anymore.

To remove confidential data from a document:

  • check whether change tracking is activated and if so, clear it by either applying all pending changes or rejecting them. (Edit | Changes)
  • check whether the document is saved using multiple versions within one document (File | Versions)
  • Check document properties for confidential data (File | Properties)
  • change all the words to the word "word" or similar (File | Find and replace). Search for "[:alnum:]*" replace with "word" and make sure "[x] regular Expression" is ticked in the search options.

State that the document is confidential and wait for a request to mail it to a developer

This of course requires you to trust the developer, and for that you need to have a feeling for who actually is a developer and who is just a random person writing a bug-comment.

And this case of course is harder for QA and everyone else to check, so as an additional requirement in this case, you have to describe the characteristics of your document in the bugreport. I.e. is it rather big or small (in terms of wordcount as well as in terms of filesize/embedded objects), does it use lots of tables, graphics, OLE-stuff, other non-basic features? Is it using sections, etc... Any info that might allow QA people to see "ah, that sounds familiar, this could be bug xy that has a public document" or a developer "I know that one, xy did just fix something in that area".

Due to no written contract, this is based on the trust you have, and there might be legal restrictions for you to use that way (if the data is not your own).

Hire a contracted developer to fix the bug and have them sign a NDA or similar document

This is the only way to have it handled in a legally binding way. (but still having signed an agreement doesn't prevent that contracted person to break it and leak information either intentionally (bad guy) or by accident (stupid guy)) Unfortunately the Certification process is just in its early steps, so there is no list of capable/trusted companies yet, so I can only name the ones I know offer contracted work. Lanedo, SuSE, RedHat probably also Canonical (the linux distros rather being in the large-scale support)

This of course then will cost you money, but it will also make sure your bug is actually fixed. If you have a larger business with tiny quirks here and there that bother you, it might be worth a thought. For a one-shot bug the paperwork, etc might be too much...