Ask Your Question

Rationale behind preference of AES over Blowfish [closed]

asked 2015-07-19 08:52:19 +0100

yg1987 gravatar image

I have read somewhere (don't remember where) that LibreOffice used to encrypt password protected files using Blowfish. But since 3.5, LO uses AES to encrypt the documents. Why was Blowfish ditched in favor of AES? I thought Blowfish makes it difficult to brute-force passwords by making initial key setup very expensive which would mean more security. So in my mind, that makes it better for security.

So, Why AES over Blowfish / Two-fish? Is this due to recent processors supporting AES ? Is this move to improve performance?

edit retag flag offensive reopen merge delete

Closed for the following reason the question is answered, right answer was accepted by Alex Kemp
close date 2020-08-25 02:04:23.952581

1 Answer

Sort by » oldest newest most voted

answered 2015-09-06 10:28:45 +0100

rpr gravatar image

updated 2015-09-09 00:20:44 +0100

The LibreOffice 3.5 Release Notes say that AES-256 is more secure encryption algorithm than Blowfish. You can find some reasoning behind this in the linked Wikipedia articles.

edit flag offensive delete link more

Question Tools

1 follower


Asked: 2015-07-19 08:52:19 +0100

Seen: 396 times

Last updated: Sep 09 '15