When we'll finally see a new UI?

I like the enthusiasm I see here for a new UI, but, there are question which pop my mind:

Is the new UI really welcome all over the world if the choice is a new UI or more stability, less bugs, higher productivity?

Our devs do a great job and I learned in another forum that most of their man power is used for bug fixes. Thus, were do you take more devs? It’s a pity but we can’t clone or hardworking devs!!!

Additionally to my answer I just submitted:

As for the choice: new UI versus more stability, less bugs thus more productivity , an on-line questionnaire of all registered users would give a pretty good picture on where the dev power should go. Each registered user should have one and only one voice.

As a comparison, see what jump Blender did from 2.49 to 2.50 with its UI. Not just the eye-candy (being more appealing to the eye and appearing more “professional”), also the workflow increased greatly, since things are easier to find now. Back to LibO - comparing the actual UI and pauloup’s mock-ups (I’m not linking them again:) ), I see similar benefits for LibO. Of course, it is a huge task, and should probably happen parallel to bugfixing, and changes under the hood to make these things possible have to be done first.
Many people sound like they expect a first alpha in 2012, but I think it is clear, that this will take at least a year. Also, I wouldn’t say the current UI is “near to unusable”, as many people seem to think. Again a Blender comparison, 2.49b was very possible to work with, just - once you got used to 2.5, you just don’t want to go back. And this means, it is a step in the right direction - forward.

It is interesting why no one attempts to provide a reply to the simple question: “Why don’t you immediately start a new, coordinated, well-defined and well-designed project to invite the public/organizations TO FUND SPECIFICALLY a total LO UI redesign/rebuild aiming at offering the best user experience?” - This IN ADDITION to whatever other activity takes place (bug fixing, compatibility changes etc.)

We really want to see LO thrive and fulfill the wishes of millions of people around the world (including me) - and I believe what will make a difference is TARGETED FUNDING REQUESTS.

I will tell you why no one has answered this question yet: because we (users of this site) are LibreOffice users that try to help other users by answering their question regarding usage of LibreOffice. Most of us are not associated with TDF or LibreOffice development in any way. This question is simply asked in wrong place.

Thank you for your suggestion. Where then this question should be asked? I was hoping TDF would see this question here. I was also hoping users would support this idea by voting it so that TDF would take it seriously, but I see no real interest - which really surprises me. Isn’t there a vision?

I think there are many replies. However, there is not much support for this idea. IMHO people are more concerned about productivity than a new cool look which requires additional time to understand it.

I am sorry, I’ll have to disagree. UI-revision is MOSTLY needed for productivity and NOT for aesthetics. The current UI is counter-productive, as has been repeatedly proved in enterprise environments. Geeks may become productive even now, but this is not the case with the average enterprise employee

I hope this thread might help make clearer the point that productivity is NOT only a result of bug-free operation, compatibility and features but of a well-designed UI too, esp. with such software (like LO) which provides the main daily working environment. This truth seems to have been overlooked.

Anyone interested in productive discussion and actual work on new UI should get in touch with LO design team: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Design
You can also try general developers mailing list and TDF discussion list (in regards of separate fund rising campaign): http://goo.gl/oPNG0

I do want new UI for some reason:

  1. Less mouse clicks to access frequently used command/menu.
  2. Easy to remember keyboard shortcut (or keyboard menu sequence).
  3. Faster and easier for text/cell/sheet formatting.
  4. Less confusing keyboard mnemonic.
  5. Ergonomic and better layout of forms, dialog boxes, etc.
  6. Less hidden but important functions.
  7. Allow user tweak for non critical matter (i.e. menu position/location)

I do saw some improvement in newer version of LO for dialog boxes and form layout. Congrats. I sure am believe that most of LO users want the better UI for better productivity.

+1 here as well

+1 here. Getting the metaphor right will be not trivial, but we need to start. Where is the place for official feedback on the little bits of a start people have made?

Basically, TDF appears to approach the issue like this;
“If a big chunk of our user-base hasn’t flocked to another solution,
we can still postpone a GUI revision.”

The biggest improvement in UI was implemented by Apache, not TDF,
which was in fact developed by IBM. The sidebar. After more than 10 years
of just replacing icons. Oh, and opening new docs in tabs within one instance is
deemed “useless”.

It just feels like “we’re what you’re stuck with, not what you choose to be with”,
which is unfortunate for such a promising product. I really want to keep using LO,
agree 100% on their values and their raison d’etre but man, oh man, this GUI will outlive
the Apocalypse.

My temporary solution is this:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73889

Please comment on it and try to bring more attention to it.