Ask Your Question

how improve track changes performance? [closed]

asked 2017-08-28 22:58:01 +0100

catbill gravatar image

updated 2020-07-23 17:29:04 +0100

Alex Kemp gravatar image

I am using track changes while working on a 60-page document. There are numerous images.

Performance is sluggish. Are there ways to improve it? Specifically:

Should performance be significantly better if I save files as .odt rather than .docx? (My default is set to .docx in case I forget to convert a file before sending it to colleagues using MS.) I think the answer is probably yes and will start saving as .odt.

Would it make sense to not use track changes and just use compare documents at the end? How do the results in compare documents differ from using track changes? I can test this but might not notice important differences.

edit retag flag offensive reopen merge delete

Closed for the following reason question is not relevant or outdated by Alex Kemp
close date 2020-07-23 17:29:43.827547

1 Answer

Sort by » oldest newest most voted

answered 2017-08-29 06:44:40 +0100

JBF gravatar image

Indeed you should save as .odt and export as .docx only if needed, because LO use OpenDocument Format as its internal format and saving as docx needs each time a file format conversion. For track changes, you could try to record changes but not show them. In LO 5.4 you have new buttons in the standard toolbar making easier using track changes.

edit flag offensive delete link more


Thank you, JBF. Even when I use .odt to work in track changes, performance is sluggish. Occasionally, Writer warns that using track changes without showing the changes can slow performance. I am therefore puzzled by why you suggest doing that. I would appreciate an answer to my question about how the results of compare documents differ from track changes.

catbill gravatar imagecatbill ( 2017-09-03 20:55:39 +0100 )edit

From what I have seen, not showing changes makes tracking changes even slower. As mentioned, LibreOffice occasionally displays a message saying that performance is better when changes are shown. So, this contradicts what JBF is saying. What am I missing? I am still hoping that there might be a way to improve performance when track changes is turned on.

catbill gravatar imagecatbill ( 2017-11-16 20:49:27 +0100 )edit

Question Tools



Asked: 2017-08-28 22:58:01 +0100

Seen: 348 times

Last updated: Aug 29 '17