# Is LibreOffice really only for people with a programmer's mind?

I hope this is relevant! Having used this site a fair bit and been grateful for simple answers which make sense, I often find I am lost because the kind person who gives information then tells me to do something beyond my knowledge without explaining how to do it. Or, I ask a question and get jumped on for not being relevant when to me the fact I am using libreoffice in the first place IS relevant. If I was using another word processor it would not be. If I say I uploaded using libreoffice to somewhere, then I want to know if the problem is to do with me using libreoffice or where I am uploading.

The question is at the end of this long-winded explanation of how I got to it. It is not the question. In fact, it includes thoughts and suggestions. I am not sure where to put those but include them to show how I got to the question. I apologise for the ramble. Miss it out and go to the end if you want!

THE BIT THAT IS NOT THE QUESTION BUT HOW I GOT TO THE QUESTION (note: by "programmer," I refer to a mindset and do not mean everyone who answers a question is a programmer.)

If I edit to explain, I am often left with more than one question. For example, I had a problem with strange symbols appearing when uploading a document. Someone jumped on me for being irrelevant. Yet, the problem was and is relevant to Libreoffice in my thinking.

Could the person not have asked, "Does this only happen on this one occasion or is it general? This would have prompted me to experiment and find, as I found, that the problem occurs even when copying and pasting to new documents from a previous one. That way I know the problem is not with the site I am uploading to, but with my downloaded version of LibreOffice.

I got a very detailed answer from someone. It helped and I am grateful, however, not everyone knows what an ISO is. I do vaguely, and suspect that the answer gives me a clue that my problem like in the download for LibreOffice on Chromebooks. I assume the code I used to install means that the Beta version of linux uses the terminal with my command, sudo apt-get install LibreOffice to find a repository and download it from there. On a Chromebook you do not get a choice to do much else. It is impossible to get LibreOffice 6 even if you download and try to install debian files or attempt to do something I never managed to do with backports.)

(Perhaps this is relevant to a board for Chromebook users, but I do not ONLY use a Chromebook. I am, however a Chromebook user who is using LibreOffice. A section for Mac users, for PC users, for Chromebook users might be helpful? Certain LibreOffice related problems may only be useful ...

edit retag close merge delete

First of all: you seem to think that those who try to answer you are "programmers" or somehow otherwise "people from LibreOffice". No, they are also users here, and they answer as they think fit. So - you are generalizing what is actually a problem of communication between users of different background.

( 2019-06-04 08:16:32 +0200 )edit

I agree, I should have said a "programmers mindset?" I do not however think they are all from LibreOffice as my understanding is they come from all over the place don't they?

( 2019-06-04 08:45:27 +0200 )edit

Even if you're not a programmer, you should read these guidelines and do your best to ask good questions.

( 2019-06-04 08:46:36 +0200 )edit

Well - since you don't think that those answering you are "from LibreOffice", then naturally you understand that someone not proffesionally trained in people communications, answering you in whatever way, misunderstanding you, or whatever, cannot represent something like "LibreOffice is for XYZ" :-)

( 2019-06-04 08:48:34 +0200 )edit

Ah but then maybe the next question is is LibreOffice really for everyone who wants to use it? Yes read the guidelines. Read that question which seems to be about someone else's confusion. Read all I can.....this does not always mean it is understood for anyone reading anything.

( 2019-06-04 09:07:24 +0200 )edit

About downvoting. I downvoted the question about strange characters because in its initial version it indicated no relevance to LibreOffice. Only after a bunch of edits it became clear, so I've canceled my downvote.

However, I downvote this one. This site is not a nonsense forum, but a questions-and-answers site about LibreOffice usage. Thus, this posting is irrelevant here.

Downvoting people is just unfriendly

There is no option to downvote people. Only to downvote questions.

( 2019-06-04 09:15:05 +0200 )edit

LibreOffice provides all its developers, QA, help writers, community (volunteers!) created. It offers what it offers; and everyone is welcome to add to that set. And there's nothing like "Is LibreOffice for this group or for that group"; it's about if you are satisfied with what is offered or not (given your personal background, and your specific case). And it's often that you might be unsatisfied; does that mean that "software Foo is not for group X"? What do you mean by that "for"? That someone who has powers denies someone right to use it? that someone methodically makes it hard for someone?

Those who are not satisfied might jump in and improve the state: they feel what's missing or poor, and may improve just that, making it better "for X". That's what it is, and how things are done here.

( 2019-06-04 09:15:25 +0200 )edit

Sort by » oldest newest most voted

No, LO is meant to be a useful tool. The Writer component is oriented towards beautiful text formatting. It tries to map typographic traditional rules on a piece of hardware/software. Of course, this mapping is done by programmers who are specialists in their own domain; sometimes not in typography.

As long as questions are targeted on usability, ergonomics, typography (and their translation into LO paradigms), answers can be given in the same vocabulary.

However, LO is a very complex app. Inevitably, documentation is lagging behind the evolution rate and feature additions. Also, its style may not be fit for all initial knowledge levels of readers (either concerning using a document processor on a computer or using LO for a specific typographic task). This is where this site comes in as a complement to the documentation.

But, you may stumble on border cases, maybe involving bugs (many many and not enough programmers). Vocabulary becomes then harder to follow because we must determine if the cause is a mistake in LO or OS usage or internal to LO. I'm no LO developer, only an enlightened power user trying to return the benefit and comfort I got for free from LO.

What is difficult is to appraise the skills of the "asker" (simultaneously in typography, LO usage and computer "fluency") from the way the question is written. Add to that the "regulars" here (only a handful) get tired by the laziness of many not opening Tools>Help nor reading the free downloadable manual where up to 80% of the answers (usually about how to use LO) can be found. They become aroused by this, which may explain the terseness or tone of their answers. The other 20% are really challenging questions or bugs.

PS: I disagree on the downvote for your question on "strange characters". This is one challenging question for me.

more

I research every single question before I ask it to see if anyone had the problem before, not just here, but usually on a general search. I also read the manual. Sometimes that is still not enough! I am really struggling with the unusual characters as I don't know if they will appear in a self-published book...seeing as they appear all over the place whenever I copy and paste. It seems likely self-publishing software might do the same. It is really annoying as the grammar editor I use tells me I have a zillion mistakes.....I suppose a PDF would not include them????

( 2019-06-04 08:52:31 +0200 )edit

No PDF will also include them. It seems you have a problem at a critical level of your computer, but the correct place to discuss it is in your ad-hoc question.

( 2019-06-04 09:29:37 +0200 )edit

Are you writing a Web Page in HTML? if so you need to define the Character set like: <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"> and that may help.

( 2019-06-04 14:37:46 +0200 )edit

No. Trying to format a book.

( 2019-06-04 20:23:42 +0200 )edit

I asked because in the early 2000s I would try and validate a web page I was working on and get such characters.

( 2019-06-04 20:31:49 +0200 )edit