We will be migrating from Ask to Discourse on the first week of August, read the details here

Ask Your Question

single scalable brackets (bra-ket) [closed]

asked 2021-03-12 17:23:56 +0200

giammi56 gravatar image

updated 2021-05-30 22:51:51 +0200

Alex Kemp gravatar image

Dear all,

I am a bit lost on how to split the bra ket operator langle <?> mline <?> rangle . I am aware of the manual which says:

For scaled brackets use none as the bracket name

a = left ( a over b right none newline left none phantom {a over b} + c right )


Be sure to put spaces (gaps) between elements when entering them directly in the Commands window. This ensures that the correct structure is recognized.

therefore to represent this

image description

I used the followings

iℏ d over {dt} none mline ψ(r ,t) rangle  = H none mline ψ( r ,t) rangle


iℏ d over {dt} phantom mline ψ(r ,t) rangle  = H phantom mline ψ( r ,t) rangle

but the results are both wrong because these are not brackets in the sense intended from the manual. How can I proceed?

Thank you for your time!

edit retag flag offensive reopen merge delete

Closed for the following reason the question is answered, right answer was accepted by Alex Kemp
close date 2021-05-22 11:46:51.152260


Lupp gravatar imageLupp ( 2021-03-12 22:18:41 +0200 )edit

2 Answers

Sort by » oldest newest most voted

answered 2021-03-12 19:08:55 +0200

LeroyG gravatar image

updated 2021-03-12 19:09:35 +0200

It seem to be that left none is the key.

Give a try to

iℏ d over {dt} left none mline ψ(r ,t) right rangle  = H left none mline ψ( r ,t) right rangle

Tested with LibreOffice (x86); OS: Windows 6.1.

Add Answer is reserved for solutions. If you think the answer is not satisfactory, add a comment below, or click edit (below your question) to add more information. Thanks.

Check the mark (Answer markCorrect answer mark) to the left of the answer that solves your question.

edit flag offensive delete link more


Yes, it works in the 7.1 version too! The only remark is that the angular bracket looks different (i.e. vertically stretched and therefore "less angular").

giammi56 gravatar imagegiammi56 ( 2021-03-12 19:17:02 +0200 )edit

answered 2021-03-12 19:19:28 +0200

ajlittoz gravatar image

updated 2021-03-12 19:59:19 +0200

Use iℏ d over {dt} left lline ψ(r ,t) right rangle = H left lline ψ( r ,t) right rangle

left xxx and right yyy must occur in pairs.

EDIT 1 The appearance of the brackets can be slightly improved with:

iℏ d over {dt} \ lline ψ(r ,t) \ rangle = H \ lline ψ( r ,t) \ rangle

i.e. you replace left and right with \.

This turns the brackets into non-scalable ones. This may be an inconvenience in some contexts.

To show the community your question has been answered, click the ✓ next to the correct answer, and "upvote" by clicking on the ^ arrow of any helpful answers. These are the mechanisms for communicating the quality of the Q&A on this site. Thanks!

In case you need clarification, edit your question (not an answer which is reserved for solutions) or comment the relevant answer.

edit flag offensive delete link more


It works, thank you! Same remark as the other solution: the quality of the brackets is different (worse) compare to langle <?> mline <?> rangle

giammi56 gravatar imagegiammi56 ( 2021-03-12 19:28:13 +0200 )edit

Don't know how it works, but \ seem better than my proposal.

LeroyG gravatar imageLeroyG ( 2021-03-12 21:05:50 +0200 )edit

It is an escape mechanism. The bracket/parenthesis code after it is no longer considered a must-be-paired bracket but an ordinary character. Since it is no longer scaled vertically, the angle is better looking. But you must also escape the other parenthesis otherwise it is orphaned and you get an error.

ajlittoz gravatar imageajlittoz ( 2021-03-12 21:22:00 +0200 )edit

Question Tools

1 follower


Asked: 2021-03-12 17:23:56 +0200

Seen: 51 times

Last updated: Mar 12