Does it also happen in previous versions?
Font creators normally provide variants for their fonts: regular, italic, bold + combinations of these. Please note that in traditional typography “italic” is not a synonym for slanted. “Italic” is supposed to offer a distinctive shape of the glyphs so that the words can be recognised as being emphasised according to author’s choice. This means an “italic” font may offer any graphical style not necessarily related to the “regular” shapes.
One implementation of “italic” is to slant the regular font but this is not mandatory.
Slanted shapes are quite easy to derive from the regular shapes that it has been offered ever since the beginning of computers (e.g. dot-matrix printers could be driven so as to produce slanted glyphs). This may be why “italic” is very often used instead of the more correct “slanted” word.
When you select italic, the font renderer will look for a specific font file implementing this variant. If no file is found, the font renderer will generate a slanted version from the regular file. I don’t think the language information is given to the font renderer to use an adapted angle. This is were the RTL attribute should be taken into account.
IMHO, LO can’t be blamed. It uses whatever font renderer is installed in the OS. I have no idea about the interface between a font renderer and application programs. I don’t know if this interface has provision for RTL/LTR attribute.
To show the community your question has been answered, click the ✓ next to the correct answer, and “upvote” by clicking on the ^ arrow of any helpful answers. These are the mechanisms for communicating the quality of the Q&A on this site. Thanks!
In case you need clarification, edit your question (not an answer which is reserved for solutions) or comment the relevant answer.