Hi, can someone provide some information or share his/her experience on features that are missing (possible breakages, recommendations) in basic ODF 1.2 format in comparison to the default ODF 1.2 extended (my main concern is Writer)?
I’m looking into using basic ODF 1.2 format mainly in order to get rid of “rsid” tags that pollute documents which I then use in translation software (OmegaT, CafeTran). Usually OCR’ed texts (and most other edited texts) need or have had some tiny corrections and that creates a lot of these tags that show up in my translation software and is just a burden. Right know my fast workaround involves copying the corrected (pre-final) text into plane text and then again into Writer before the final formatting (or sometimes I save it all as .doc and then again as .odt). I’ve just noticed that ODF 1.2 documents are leaner by default than their extended counterparts.
So is there anything major I should be concerned if choosing basic ODF 1.2? It seems I can’t save a fast copy in a different ODF format thus I can’t just work in both formats. If it is possible (maybe a headless conversion in Linux between odf-1.2 and odf-1.2 extended?), I would just safely try both formats.