Appearance: lost formattings of individual words in a operation

[koyotak]

Whenever I’m assigning a cell with an operator to another cell with text, the original formatting of individual words is getting lost.
Example:

• content in [A1]: “Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consecteur adipiscu elitaer.” →
• formula in [A2] =A1 →
• displayed in [A2]: “Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consecteur adipiscu elitaer.”

The formula symbols explicitly refers to superscript and subscript characters, so-called indexes, such as “Q_v” or “d_min” or “/PHi/_th” which are secundary ignored.

0_LO-CALC_doubled formattings_020951.ods (19.7 KB)

… compared to HTML: <i>R</i><sub>th</sub> → R_th

What can i do to accept the secundary cell the formattings in the primary cell?

[mariosv]

Feature request - "inherited" formatting for referred cells

Right now if cell A1=“Bob was really surprised!” and cell A2="=A1", cell A2 would only carry the text, not the italics and bold from A1. For me this poses a problem - I have complex sheets with formatted comments as a component of them. It would be nice if there was an “inherited” format checkbox where you could have the inherited format override default formatting!

[koyotak]

Nothing changes since 2015?

[mariosv]

And I don’t think it’s going to change for a long time.