=SUMPRODUCT( LARGE( A1:A9 + B1:B9; {1.2.3} ) )
a) Is there an alternative to replacing the fixed LARGE positions {1.2.3} by assigning them to variables in three cells?
b.1) Why does the formula ‘=LARGE(A1:A9+B1:B9;1)’ return an incorrect value, while
b.2) ‘=LARGE(A1:A9+B1:B9;2)’ … ‘_;3)’ returns the error “#VALUE!”?
Even though they are part of the “Dutch” formula referenced above?
I cannot understand the coupling of the both formulas therein.
If I split the “Dutch” formula into 3, or rather 6 very simple ones, and add all results of them together, everything is correct. Furthermore, the manual numerical assignment of the value position {1.2.3} in the original formula works if it is also split. This is no great work. The change to, say {2.5.7}, has to be implanted, which isn’t brilliant here when you have to assign externally.
LO-CALC_combinates Sumproduct with Large_v0000_043349.ods (32.7 KB)